- > To analyze our sample of 67 papers, we applied a coding scheme we derived in the first review we conducted in 2014. This previous analysis had suggested that (1) some of the design principles focused attention on users’ use of artifacts; (2) some talked mainly about the artifacts and little about the users; and (3) the remainder attended to both (i.e., focused on both artifact and action). We used this simple coding scheme as the basis for our analysis. i’m not sure what this actually achieved. Surely there were other dimensions along which different design theory papers differentiated? why are the only three possibilities and – the only three possible interesting pieces of data to come from each of these papers — whether they are about artifact rules, user rules, or both?
Search
⇡