This is about where I start to get worried/skeptical about WIL. I don’t think most universities actually want WIL to be about curriculum. I see a lot of universities talking about WIL. I see them setting up conferences so they can talk amongst themselves about it (though I note that students — the alleged beneficiaries of these programs — tend not to get invited to these affairs). I don’t see them taking many new steps to really think deeply about how WIL integrates into the curriculum. Sure, in some fields (like Engineering) they don’t need to do that because it’s already been thought through. But Humanities? Fine Arts? Science?  What I see is a lot of universities attempting to re-classify stuff they already do as WIL and in some cases making attempts to add some short-term internships to their roster of student services. But I see almost nothing of scale which genuinely attempts to integrate these learning experiences into curriculum because that would require institutions to have curriculum in these areas (as opposed to a bunch of buckets which students must fill up with credits).
    Next → → If they want to convince people they are serious about WIL and not just go through the motions for a year or two to placate politicians who are temporarily hot for the idea because it’s the “new thing”, they need to do a lot more than write a letter. If they want to convince people they are serious about WIL and not just go through the motions for a year or two to placate politicians who are ← Previous → Azeem’s end note I am spending a bit of time over the coming months thinking about data in the context of the new information age. I’m particularly
    Latest posts
    Design management for wicked problems - ADMC 2020
    → Intuition is confident abductive-inferential thinking
    The Verge → Researchers detail huge hack-for-hire campaigns against environmentalists
    Conversations, cybernetics, and Theory of Mind
    → Why are we exceeding the Earth’s carrying capacity?
    IDEO U's Creative Confidence Podcast → Roger Martin, Bianca Andreescu, and systemic strategy
    Reuters → Systemic lessons from South Korea’s Patient 31
    Axle → Divide & conquer
    FSG → Can Snow Clearing Be Sexist?
    The Verge → As Lambda students speak out, the school’s debt-swapping partnership disappears from the internet
    The Talk Show → “Bring It On, Haters”, With Special Guest Ben Thompson
    Facebook → Starting the Decade by Giving You More Control Over Your Privacy
    Motherboard → Leaked Documents Expose the Secretive Market for Your Web Browsing Data
    The Verge → Google’s ads just look like search results now
    MacMillan → Interference by Sue Burke
    Systemics and design principles in support of Tiago Forte’s PARA framework
    → Microsoft wants to capture all of the carbon dioxide it’s ever emitted
    → US announces AI software export restrictions for China
    → Science Conferences Are Stuck in the Dark Ages
    → This wireless power startup says it can charge your phone using only radio waves
    → Segway’s newest self-balancing vehicle is an egg-shaped wheelchair
    → Twitter announces Bluesky: a team seeking and developing an open standard for social media
    → Elon Musk attempts to explain Twitter to normal people in court
    → TED and YouTube launch global climate initiative
    → Embracing multilingualism to enhance complexity sensitive research
    → The ‘Amazon effect’ is flooding a struggling recycling system with cardboard
    → John Kerry, Arnold Schwarzenegger wage ‘World War Zero’ on climate change
    → Combining semantic and term frequency similarities for text clustering
    → Bad RCS implementations are creating big vulnerabilities, security researchers claim
    → 2019 Tech Trends Report — The Future Today Institute
    → Medical Crowdsourcing: Harnessing the “Wisdom of the Crowd” to Solve Medical Mysteries