This is about where I start to get worried/skeptical about WIL. I don’t think most universities actually want WIL to be about curriculum. I see a lot of universities talking about WIL. I see them setting up conferences so they can talk amongst themselves about it (though I note that students — the alleged beneficiaries of these programs — tend not to get invited to these affairs). I don’t see them taking many new steps to really think deeply about how WIL integrates into the curriculum. Sure, in some fields (like Engineering) they don’t need to do that because it’s already been thought through. But Humanities? Fine Arts? Science?  What I see is a lot of universities attempting to re-classify stuff they already do as WIL and in some cases making attempts to add some short-term internships to their roster of student services. But I see almost nothing of scale which genuinely attempts to integrate these learning experiences into curriculum because that would require institutions to have curriculum in these areas (as opposed to a bunch of buckets which students must fill up with credits).
Up Next Next → If they want to convince people they are serious about WIL and not just go through the motions for a year or two to placate politicians who are temporarily hot for the idea because it’s the “new thing”, they need to do a lot more than write a letter. ← Previous Azeem’s end note I am spending a bit of time over the coming months thinking about data in the context of the new information age. I’m
Latest posts
▵  Elon Musk attempts to explain Twitter to normal people in court
▵  TED and YouTube launch global climate initiative
▵  Embracing multilingualism to enhance complexity sensitive research
▵  The ‘Amazon effect’ is flooding a struggling recycling system with cardboard
▵  John Kerry, Arnold Schwarzenegger wage ‘World War Zero’ on climate change
▵  Combining semantic and term frequency similarities for text clustering
▵  Bad RCS implementations are creating big vulnerabilities, security researchers claim
▵  2019 Tech Trends Report — The Future Today Institute
▵  Medical Crowdsourcing: Harnessing the “Wisdom of the Crowd” to Solve Medical Mysteries
▵  Report Launch - OPSI Primer on AI for the Public Sector
▵  “Level Up”: Leveraging Skill and Engagement to Maximize Player Gameplay
▵  Beautiful is Good and Good is Reputable: Multiple-Attribute Charity Website Evaluation and Initial Perceptions of Reputation Under the Halo Effect
▵  Piret Tõnurist & Systems Change: how to get started and keep going?
▵  IBM expert Tamreem El Tohamy on bridging the skills gap in Africa
▵  The changing work of innovation for public value and social impact
▵  Former Go champion beaten by DeepMind retires after declaring AI invincible
▵  What part of “viral” content makes platforms want to encourage its spread?
▵  MTA floods NYC subway entrance because ‘climate change is real’
▵  The Demon Haunted World
▵  How to recognize AI snake oil
▵  A Systemic View of Research Impact
▵  Nobel Economics Prize Goes to Pioneers in Reducing Poverty
A brief, informal guide to doing grounded theory
▵  Adam Savage on Lists, More Lists, and the Power of Checkboxes
▵  Systems Practice, Abridged
▵  Fukushima reinvents itself with a $2.7 billion bet on renewables
▵  How Tesla’s first Gigafactory is changing Reno, Nevada
▵  “This is Sticking with Them:” Professor Explores Benefits of Model-Based Learning
Keeping the buzz in buzzwords
▵  README.txt: Introducing Into the Dataverse, the article series
▵  A ton of people received text messages overnight that were originally sent on Valentine’s Day